Introduction
Impact investing is an increasingly popular way for investors to generate both financial returns and positive social or environmental outcomes. This type of investing aims to create measurable positive impacts alongside financial returns and can be used to address issues such as climate change, poverty, and inequality. However, choosing the right structure for an impact investment is crucial to achieving these goals and maximizing returns.
The purpose of this post is to provide guidance on how to choose the best structure for an impact investment. We will outline the different types of structures that can be used for impact investing and the advantages and disadvantages of each, including:
· partnerships,
· corporations,
· limited liability partnerships (LLP),
· trusts.
Additionally, we will discuss:
· the tax implications of each structure;
· the level of liability protection;
· the distribution of profits and losses;
· regulatory requirements;
· administrative complexity.
By the end of this post, readers will have a better understanding of the various options available and how to choose the right structure for their impact investment goals.
Types of structures
There are several types of structures that can be used for impact investments, each with their own advantages and disadvantages.
Partnerships
In a partnership, investors pool their resources and share profits and losses. Partnerships are generally less formal and less costly to set up than other structures, and they offer a high degree of flexibility in terms of decision-making and profit-sharing. However, partnerships also require active participation from all partners, which may not be feasible in some situations. Each partner is liable for the actions of the partnerships in such a structure. If the partnership requires additional capital, it has to admit a new partner.
Corporations
Corporations are another option, where investors purchase shares in the company and receive dividends based on the profits earned. Corporations offer limited liability protection to shareholders, which can be an advantage in mitigating personal liability for the corporation's debts and obligations. Additionally, corporations can raise capital from many investors (either by issuing shares or debt securities), which can be advantageous for large-scale renewable energy projects. However, corporations are subject to corporate taxation, which may result in a higher overall tax burden for the corporation and its shareholders.
Limited Liability Partnership
LLPs are a hybrid structure that combines the liability protection of a corporation with the tax benefits of a partnership. LLPs allow for pass-through taxation, which means that the income earned by the LLP is not subject to tax at the entity level, but rather flows through to the members, who are taxed on their share of the income at their individual tax rates. LLPs offer several advantages, including flexibility in tax treatment, management, and ownership, as well as liability protection for members. However, LLPs may have more complex tax reporting requirements compared to partnerships.
Trusts
Trusts are a common structure used for impact investments, particularly when it comes to distributing returns to many clients (including retail clients). Trusts are treated as flow-through entities for tax purposes, which means that the income earned by the trust flows through to the beneficiaries, who are taxed on their share of the income at their individual tax rates. Additionally, trusts can offer greater flexibility in terms of managing and distributing returns to beneficiaries. However, trusts can be more complex and costly to set up and administer compared to some of the other structures.
How to choose?
The choice of structure is often driven by a number of competing priorities – the taxation consequences of the structure; the ease of raising capital; whether or not land is held as part of the project; how the revenue is generated; the type of returns being targeted.
The ultimate choice of structure balances these competing priorities and ultimately seeks to deliver the goals of the investors in the most efficient, effective structure. For example, partnerships may be appropriate for small-scale renewable energy projects, while corporations or trusts may be suitable for large-scale projects that require significant capital investment.
Distribution of profits and losses
The distribution of profits and losses is an important consideration when choosing the best structure for an impact investment. Each structure has different rules for how profits and losses are distributed to investors, and the flexibility offered by each structure can impact the investment's financial returns.
Partnerships and LLPs typically allow for a high degree of flexibility in terms of managing and distributing returns. The profits and losses of the partnership or LLP are allocated to the partners or members based on their ownership percentage, and these allocations can be adjusted through the use of special allocations. This flexibility can be advantageous in managing and distributing returns to investors based on their individual needs and preferences.
Corporations, on the other hand, generally distribute profits in the form of dividends to shareholders based on the number of shares they own. This can limit the flexibility of managing and distributing returns, particularly if the shareholders have different needs and preferences.
Trusts can offer greater flexibility in terms of managing and distributing returns to beneficiaries. The trustee may have discretion over how and when to distribute income and capital to the beneficiaries, which can be advantageous in tailoring distributions to the needs of individual beneficiaries.
The choice of structure will depend on the specific circumstances of the investment and the goals of the investors. For example, partnerships may be appropriate if investors want greater flexibility in managing and distributing returns, while trusts may be more suitable if investors want greater flexibility in tailoring distributions to the needs of individual beneficiaries. It is important to consult with a tax advisor or legal professional to determine the best structure for a specific situation.
Management and control
Management and control structures are an important factor to consider when choosing the best structure for an impact investment. Each structure has different rules for management and control, which can impact decision-making, voting rights, and other important factors.
Partnerships and LLPs typically offer a high degree of flexibility in terms of management and control. The partners or members are typically involved in the day-to-day management of the business, and decisions are generally made by a vote of the partners or members. This can be advantageous in allowing investors to have a direct say in the management and operations of the business.
Corporations, on the other hand, are typically managed by a board of directors, who are elected by the shareholders. The board of directors is responsible for making strategic decisions and overseeing the management of the corporation. Shareholders typically have the right to vote on major decisions, such as the election of directors and major business transactions.
Trusts are managed by a trustee, who is responsible for managing the trust assets and making distributions to the beneficiaries. Trustees will generally appoint fund managers to make investment decisions. The beneficiaries of the trust (ie investors) generally do not have a direct say in the management of the trust, but they may have the right to remove the trustee if they are not satisfied with the trustee's performance.
Other factors
In addition to tax considerations, distribution of profits and losses, and management and control structures, there are other factors that may be relevant when choosing the best structure for an impact investment. Investor preferences, regulatory requirements, and administrative complexity are some of the important factors to consider.
Investor preferences can play a role in determining the best structure for an impact investment. For example, if investors are looking for a socially responsible investment, they may prefer a structure that aligns with their values and allows them to have a direct say in the management of the investment.
Regulatory requirements are another important factor to consider. Some structures may be subject to more stringent regulatory requirements than others. For example, a trust structure is usually highly regulated and, in Australia will require an Australian Financial Services License. The trustee also has a fiduciary obligation to the beneficiaries (ie investors). These regulatory requirements can impact the complexity and cost of setting up and maintaining the investment. Additionally, certain structures may be more suitable for certain types of investments, depending on the regulatory environment in which they operate.
Administrative complexity is also an important consideration. Some structures may be more complex to set up and maintain than others, which can impact the cost and feasibility of the investment. These can include unit price calculation; filing tax returns; compliance with financial service laws; and corporate governance, which can add to the administrative burden of the investment.
Conclusion
Choosing the best structure for an impact investment is a complex decision that requires careful consideration of a variety of factors, including tax implications, distribution of profits and losses, management and control structures, regulatory requirements and other important considerations. The right structure can impact the financial returns, tax implications, and social and environmental impact of the investment.
To choose the best structure for an impact investment, it is important to first understand the advantages and disadvantages of each type of structure, as well as the specific circumstances of the investment and the goals of the investors. This may require consulting with a financial advisor or legal professional who can provide guidance and help investors navigate the various options.
Additionally, conducting thorough due diligence and research is essential in making informed investment decisions. This includes researching the regulatory requirements and administrative complexity associated with each structure, as well as the track record and performance of the investment.
In summary, choosing the best structure for an impact investment requires careful consideration of a variety of factors. By understanding the various options available, conducting thorough due diligence, and consulting with tax and financial service experts, investors can make informed decisions and maximize their impact and financial returns.
ABML Legal are experts specialising in impact investing solutions. Together we can advise you on the best structures for your needs in achieving your impact investment outcomes.
Commenti